Wednesday, October 15, 2008

A Short History of Navigation, or Why My Garmin is Worth the Angst

Back in the days of antiquity--2002--when I was training for my first marathon, I was in the dark about a lot of things in the running world. GPS stood for Goin' Pretty Slow, and my pacing goals were threefold: walking, walking faster, and jogging. Distance was my only focus, and for that I used a marvelously simple device that was not troubled by a bezel, lost satellite reception, or hateful customer service reps. It was also decidedly feminine, bearing a not-too-subtle resemblance to a tampon.

A tampon with a notched metal wheel (ouch).

I used this pen to measure distance on a map. A paper one. Remember paper?

Then I learned about this place on the computer called the internets, where you can do all kinds of exciting things, like stalking people and stealing identities. It was a wonderland! My attempts to assume Gwyneth's identity were thwarted by realizing that a little know-how might allow me to steal someone's credit card number but not her gloriously long blond hair and goddess-like features. But I overcame this disappointment in the WWW when I found Map My Run, which I used for my second marathon, when again, I only cared about distance.


But what if I wanted to just head out into the great unknown and know precisely when to turn around for a 11.33-mile run? And what if I thought it might be fun to look at my wrist every 3 seconds to see how fast I was going and if that number in the hundredths place had switched over yet? This would really improve my enjoyment of running. Landscapes of fir trees, wildlife, and sky can get so banal. I needed data.

Yes, a GPS would be mine. Enter the Garmin 305, which I called Big Red, though it's far too complicated to explain why.


Red was a good solid friend, like the reliable one you screw over when someone more intriguing comes along.

And so I got a Garmin 405.

The best way I can describe my decision to trade in Big Red for the new model is to say that I'm in a relationship with this entity that drives me completely insane but who I cannot live without. Most of us have this person in our lives. My watch is this person. If Henry had a sibling, I imagine they'd have a similar relationship.

And so, four months after buying it, I will say that if there is no other option on the market that appeals to your needs, and the price tag isn't a deterrent, it's worth it. I haven't tried Nike +, and there are other foot pod options that might yield less frustrating runs than Garmin. Certainly less frustrating phone calls to customer service. But at this point, the 405 and I are in a mutually disrespectful, yet completely necessary, relationship.

If you look back at my post about calling Garmin, you'll see lots of comments expressing similar angst*. So when you buy one, you know what you might be getting into. That said, once I started wearing the sweat band under the watch, my problems went away. I still think a watch this expensive should not require a sweat band, but there it is.

Other cons:
* Second-to-second pacing is never reliable
* Bezel is affected by rain, and things go wonky from there
* Distance is usually slightly off (usually more than race distance)
* The thing is huge
* Battery doesn't last more than a day on a charge
* Can't sync it with a Mac

Some pros, versus the 305:
* Gets a satellite very fast
* Is more comfortable to a smaller wrist
* Doesn't look like a 1983 Casio calculator watch

So there's my review of the 405. Frankly, you might as well buy one, since the thing seems to be a better investment than the stock market. At least it always yields numbers above zero.

*it's also my in the top-3 for page views, falling behind by my ice bath and my top running songs. Apparently people still care what I think about music after my psycho Springsteen love fest in August. And everyone loves a good ice bath photo.

12 comments:

Holly said...

Ahh, but see, I have never had any of those problems with my 305. Although I do wear a sports band under it 90% of the time, mostly for comfort and also to possibly protect the connection to my computer (that may be in my head, but it makes me feel better). Even if it is pretty much a Casio calculator on my wrist, I'm happy. :)

(P.S. Hi, I'm a new reader. I found you through Half-Fast, I think. Linking your ice bath. BRRR.)

thebets said...

If you became Gwyneth, you'd have to rename your kids after food groups, but hey...they can always pay you back later.

Thanks for the review of the Garmins...I've been coveting one for a while and your comments were helpful!

Vanilla said...

I've been thinking about upgrading to the 405, mostly for the size issue. I always feel like a bit of a shmuk (schmuk? shmuck?) with my huge 205 strapped to my wrist, your parallel to the Casio calculator watch is disturbingly accurate. However I went to try on the 405 and it's just as big as the 205 and 305, it's just round instead of square. It even sticks up off my bony wrist as high as the 205 does so now I'm thinking about just sticking with what I've got.

Your post did nothing to make me think the 405 is the watch for me... I don't know... maybe it was the fact that you list 6 cons and only 3 pros...

Marcy said...

I'll be sticking to the 205 for now . . . Honestly, I need the big ole screen and numbers cause I'm one blind mo-foer LOL

Kristina said...

Yeah, I think my conclusion is that if I had no watch and cost weren't an issue, I'd go with the 405. But if I had already shelled out for a 205 or a 305, I'd stick with either of those. The 405 is better than nothing, but not a huge improvement over the other models (and brings new headaches with it). You're right that it's still a huge sucker, though less ridiculous looking by virtue of its shape.

Kristin said...

Do you know there is a new ANT agent to download? I got the email from my buddy Austin Arnold at Garmin (who was my contact during my Garmin problems). I'm assuming the info went out to all registered users, not just the ones who emailed Garmin to bitch about their problems!

Pat said...

I love my 305.

Kel said...

I'm totally in love with my garmin 305 - it does everything I want it to do and then some. Yes, I think it take a bit of getting used to, but now I can't imagine running without it.

Everybody needs one of these love/hate relationships in their lives!
~K

Jeannie said...

Thanks for the info Kristina. I ended up with the Suunto t4c because the Maverick already knows how to use it & frankly I don't have the time, or attention span, to learn something new. Of course, they've updated it since Kevin bought his, so it's been me and the manual since 8am this morning. Wishing right now that I had listened to my father & majored in engineering instead of history.

Run Mommy said...

As someone in debate over the Garmin..I enjoyed your post. I currently have the Nike+iPod and while I love it- I see the weaknesses!

Love the blog - I especially enjoy the moms!

Ovens2Betsy said...

"Can't sync it with a Mac;" that's a deal-breaker for me! However, I do wear a sweatband under my 305 on really long runs as it bumps up against my wrist bones if I don't.

Jessica said...

Hey Kristina,

I have followed your blog for about a month and I think you are hilarious. You inspired me to start my own. If you get time, go to www-sole-mama.blogspot.com

Keep up the good writing! Good luck BQ, I am running Tucson with hopes of qualifying as well! Jessica